Photobucket

Wednesday, July 12, 2006

teach your children well (or you will end up where I am now)

When I was pregnant with Henry, I worried about all sorts of things, the most irrational of which was, by far, that the baby would be ugly. Yes! Really! One night I said to Wade, "What if the baby isn't cute?" He looked at me like he was waiting for the punch line of a joke. "Seriously," I said, "WHAT IF THE BABY ISN'T CUTE???"

I don't know why he didn't smack me; probably because I was pregnant. And ironically, at not quite five pounds, Henry wasn't exactly "cute." But he recovered! And was a very cute baby.

Anyway, I guess I was so worried about how cute my baby would be that I didn't worry much about Really Important Things, like how I would get these kids to read. Because suddenly, it's an issue.

We have always read to our sons. When Henry was a baby, I would put him in the bouncy seat or under the Gymini and read Jane Austen to him. I think, in his first year, we read all of Pride and Prejudice and most of Sense and Sensibility, (they're the most baby-friendly of the Austen canon, you know). We skipped baby books altogether (because baby books are boring! who cares where baby's toes are? I don't need a book to play that game! boring! get to the good stuff! with plot! and characters! and beautiful language! THAT is what will make him love reading!) and went right to picture books like Henry Hikes to Fitchburg and Green Eggs and Ham.

I was a reader myself, and so I read all about how to raise my baby, particularly those articles about teaching children to love reading--you know, the ones that say Have Lots Of Books In Your House! and Let Your Children Catch You Reading! and my personal favorite, Read To Your Child For Thirty Minutes Each Day! When Henry was a toddler Wade and I would laugh ourselves silly every time we heard those PSAs, the ones that make it sound like a BIG STRUGGLE to find thirty minutes a day to read to your child. Because at our house, story time could last for, oh, TWO HOURS. No joking.

Henry loved to be read to, but he wouldn't sit still and look at the book (probably because he COULDN'T SEE IT). He would walk around the room and play with toys and do his thing while we read, but if we stopped he would come over and tap the book or push it at us or hit us with it, depending on how much he thought he was being ignored. He would listen to the same book over and over and over (and over and over and over and . . . ). These weren't sweet little Sandra Boynton books, oh no--these were big ass LOOOONG books like Katie and the Sunflowers, which is a book about IMPRESSIONIST PAINTERS for god's sake. Eventually we skipped from picture books to juvenile novels, because those Beginning Reader books are so boring! All those simple words! and no good plot! Those won't teach kids to love reading!

We patted ourselves on the back all the time because Henry loved books so much, and loved good books. Clearly, we were doing the right thing. Weren't we?

Just this week it has dawned on us that Charlie doesn't know any of his letters. (How do we know this? Because when we show him letters, he says, "Look at the numbers! What numbers are those?" or if we show him, say, a C, which he SHOULD know, he says, "It's a . . . twelve?") Wade was a little freaked out about this until I pointed out that Henry, who DID know all his letters at four, REFUSES to read. He CAN read, but will often cry--CRY!--if we ask him to read something.

Either way, I am the mother of two illiterate children.

So last night we made a Plan: we (okay, I) would take the boys to the bookstore and let them each pick out a book. Henry's would need to be a Level 1 reader; Charlie's would be an alphabet book. When Henry had read his ENTIRE book, out loud, to one of us, he could get another book; when he had read that one, he could get another, and so on. He could chose superhero books if he wanted, but HE would have to read them, not us.

Charlie just needs to learn his letters. That's it! Just learn his letters. And then I will buy him a pony. Or something. (His plan is a little more vague, because he's not the one I worry about.)

It sounded like a good plan! Until this afternoon when I told the boys about it and the crying started. At one point they were both saying, "We don't want ANY NEW BOOKS! EVER!" And I was all, "OH NO, WE ARE GETTING NEW BOOKS. YOU WILL PICK OUT A NEW BOOK RIGHT NOW, BOTH OF YOU."

What the hell???

By the time Wade came home, Henry had read 11 pages of Danny and the Dinosaur Go to Camp, and Charlie was totally in love with his Leap Frog alphabet book, and BOTH of them were all about learning to read. So I guess we're through the worst part.

21 Comments:

Blogger Karyn said...

Dude! You never, EVER say stuff like "I guess we're through the worst part" out loud - or type it where the Universe can see it! Sheesh! That's tempting fate! I'm knocking wood FOR you!

It's a toss up - it's a gamble - every time, every kid, every gamble. I know now that you can do everything right and still be bitten in the butt by The Universe.

You just never know.

But you read to them, they like their books and you've got a plan - I think you get full marks.

7/12/2006 09:58:00 PM  
Blogger adria said...

Now, that is a public service announcement from life in bizarro world!

I love that you are threatening them with new books!
Maybe you should have Henry teach Charlie his letters and numbers - it could get them both interested without them knowing they are.

7/12/2006 10:39:00 PM  
Blogger Melissa said...

We went through the crying-when-asked-to-read phase for a LONG time with Abigail. Then we played the "You read the first sentence, I'll read the rest of the chapter!" game for a LONG time. And there was crying involved in that game as well.

There are lots of good easy readers with plot. (NOT the one called The Fat Cat Sat on The Mat! Do NOT buy anything with any arrangement of those words in the title!) Zack's Alligator, Aunt Eater, Mr. Putter and Tabby, Henry and Mudge-- all popular around here. So are the damn Boxcar Children, but seriously, if you can find ANY way to avoid those books, do.

And Arnold Lobel! There are CDs of him reading the Frog and Toad stories, and Mouse Soup, and I don't know what else, but reading and listening is always good!

And anyhow, if the reading thing doesn't work out, they can always fall back on their general cuteness.

7/12/2006 11:13:00 PM  
Blogger Cmommy said...

I've been gleaning from this "Reading Games For Young Children" by Jackie Silberg; LOTS of great ideas that involve sensory stuff, fine motor, memory, cognition, observation.

My soon to be Kindergartener can recognize six letters--wanna guess them?! And, I will be teaching preK. Yup, feeling like a bit of a failure! But, it will all work out in the end. Keep us posted! C

7/12/2006 11:52:00 PM  
Blogger Melissa said...

Also, I would avoid the phrase "he's not the one I worry about," for the same reasons delineated by Karyn, above.

7/13/2006 01:55:00 AM  
Blogger Velma said...

Hello?? That's what kindergarden is for!

I can speak with such masterful authority because I went through this same path with Pepper last summer. After similar agonizing (and wailing on her part), I convinced myself that it was better if she didn't show up at school all ready to read and then have to sit there all year, bored while the other kids practiced their vowel sounds. Yeah, that's the ticket!

Anyway, she's reading now, picked it right up. She loved the book buddies program at her school, begs for the bookstore, and will NOT get off my back about finishing up her summer homework. She's oviously a changeling from some more academically-minded mother.

7/13/2006 04:06:00 AM  
Blogger chichimama said...

Oh, I am so glad I am not the only one whose child bursts into tears when asked to read and insists that he can not do it. I have had visions of reading his calculus homework to him.

Sounds like you did a great job, and everyone is on their way. Does Charlie like puzzles? C learned most of his letters using by doing the alphabet puzzle over and over again.

And with the early readers, my mom insists that one has to take most of them out of the library or else the child memorizes them and then fakes one into thinking he is reading. And then when kindergarten hits, you find out he had just memorized every book in you house and can't actually read. Not that she had a child who did that of course...

Oh, and we read the New York Times in the bouncy, skipping over the murders and really scarey stuff. Jane Austen was a good choice, I didn't think of that.

7/13/2006 05:56:00 AM  
Blogger Karyn said...

Yup, I forgot, Letter / Number puzzles are a GREAT way to memorize the tricky little blighters. And, heaven forgive me, my oldest son has an ASD, and would only repeat / mimic things on video. Guess who wound up watching WAY more than the 1 hour per day of television I once aspired to brag about? Yeah. On the upside, at age 3 he was testing over age 7 for speech & vocabulary. Whatever works for you - screw everyone else.

I also started spelling Good Things aloud to get my eldest interested in what I was saying and trying to sound it out.

Does anyone want a S-T-I-C-K-E-R? I-C-E C-R-E-A-M? I know that's cruel because they've both got silent letters but it got him interested and he did start trying to sound out things ... so that was successful... but beware - the little trick we used so long in spelling out curse words is backfiring.

"What's a little B-A-S-T-A-R-D?"

Holy God. And I've no-one to blame but myself.

7/13/2006 06:45:00 AM  
Blogger Susan said...

Karyn, THAT'S funny.

And I am reassured by everyone's stories of Reading Resistance. My illiterate children will at least be in good company.

7/13/2006 07:42:00 AM  
Anonymous Mir said...

If I learn all of my letters, will you buy ME a pony?

Seriously, Chickadee refused to read until I wondered if I'd dropped her on her head, and then she was devouring Harry Potter. Like, overnight.

Monkey finished kindergarten surprisingly unable to read. I pushed and he cried and I tried to push in a more! fun! way! and he cried and I gave up and now... he reads. When he thinks I'm not looking. HA!

7/13/2006 09:23:00 AM  
Blogger Tara said...

Yes its the dreaded, much maligned t.v. But- Baby Bumblebee vocabulary building videos were the foundation on which my Littleman began his reading. He's five, has Asperger's and just tested at the second grade level for reading and comprehension so I guess it was a good thing after all! Glad to hear they are on their way!

7/13/2006 09:35:00 AM  
Anonymous holly said...

You know what is demoralizing? When your 4 year old comes home on Valentine's Day with a bagful of Valentines with his friends' names neatly signed on each card. When your son can only manage to write the first letter of his name, A, and refused to do even that on the cards he gave out, on principle. But you know what else? Six months later, not only is said 4 year old now writing his entire name (first and last!) but he is also able to write out the names of his favorite baseball players. (Gotta get his priorities straight.) It's simply our job as a mommy to worry about these things.

By the way, I love that you read Jane Austen to your son as a baby. Jane Austen holds a special place in my heart because she was the topic of my (dreadfully written) college honors thesis: "Jane Austen and the Feminist Tradition." (And I must note that this was waaaay before Jane Austen became hip and every one of her novels was made into a movie starring Gwyneth Paltrow or Keira Knightley.)

7/13/2006 10:14:00 AM  
Blogger desiree said...

Oh my goodness I love your choice of children's names. I don't know how this is relevant but I so loved those names as a child I named my ken dolls Henry and Charles and as an adult my cat's name was Henry. Isn't that nice affirmation? Some crazy internet person named inanimate objects and a cat the names of your CHILDREN?

Gah.

I will shut up about that now.

However, I applaud your proactive approach to teaching youngins to read. We got my brother interested in it by playing RPG video games in front of him when he was three and refusing to read the screens for him. The only reason he learned to read was so that he could play Dragon warrior.

Seriously, sorry about the long comment.

7/13/2006 11:42:00 AM  
Blogger Kara said...

Hello, my name is Kara. I teach reading to learning disabled children. I am very good at it... and yet, my own child is only luke warm about reading. Loves books on tape, loves being read to, has known all of her letters since she was 2 or 3.

But I'm not really worried...kids will read when they're ready barring any major learning impediment. Mags didn't want to read in kindergarten, but this summmer, she more into it. We like the BOB books (http://www.bobbooks.com/). Yes, they are basic and don't have much of a plot, BUT they practice vowel repitition which is the most important skill for early readers. If Henry isn't reading within a year of grade level by the time he's wrapping-up 1st grade, take him to a specialist (just what you need- another specialist!). Until then, he's still well within "normal range" (many specialists use 8y.o. as the magic #, but given Henry's developmental profile, you may want to plug him in early if he's not on track by then). As with most things, girls tend to be a little ahead of boys in this area. So, good news is- they're not "behind" schedule by any means! And if you spaz out about reading and push it on them, it becomes a chore rater than a pleasure. And who needs that?

7/13/2006 12:27:00 PM  
Blogger Susan said...

BOB books! Kara, I totally forgot about those! Thank you.

Would you just move here and take care of me? Please?

7/13/2006 12:31:00 PM  
Blogger Rebecca said...

Echoing chichmama's suggestion about the library. The memorization factor and the speed with which kids progress through reading levels makes buying early readers a costly and somewhat conterproductive approach.

FWIW, my daughter went through the same crying phase after learning to read. We backed off completely for a while and pretended not to notice when she would read to herself, which helped a lot. When she started to show some interest in reading aloud to us again, I purposely steered her toward books that I knew were far *below* her ability level. It was so easy for her to read them that there was absolutely zero frustration (and admittedly zero effort) involved. She got excited about reading again because it was easy and fun, and her skills (and book selections) have ramped up pretty quickly.

Also echoing the puzzle suggestion for Charlie. After I had a similar revelation about neglecting my second child's education, he learned the alphabet in about a week using an alphabet puzzle with no involvement from me (my kids seem to learn best when they think it's their idea).

Good luck!

7/13/2006 02:31:00 PM  
Blogger Candace said...

Christopher's preschool teachers turned us on to Hooked on Phonics. I know, I know; it's sold on TV for crying out loud. But it totally works. Better than "it works", it worked WITH CHRISTOPHER.

But it sounds like you're past the worst now (YES! I'm saying it! Take THAT, Universe!) so maybe someone else can go the Hooked on Phonics route.

7/13/2006 03:15:00 PM  
Anonymous Caryn said...

Okay, this scares me because I'm a reader, and my husband is a reader, and we're both proactive enough to learn how to teach our children to love reading. And now I find that it's no sure thing. Which should be obvious, but still.

Good luck with the reading encouragement.

7/13/2006 03:22:00 PM  
Blogger The Daring One said...

I love the image of you reading Jane Austen to them. They are doomed to be English majors. I think your efforts are so awesome and make me feel a little meh about what we've done. I read so much more to Laylee and now with Magoo, I'm just lazy.

7/13/2006 03:35:00 PM  
Blogger Kristen said...

I'm glad you mentioned this, because like Henry, Bryce knew his letters very early, loves to listen to books, but doesn't show any interest in true reading. And from all the info in the comments, it sounds like maybe that's still okay (for now)...

7/13/2006 09:03:00 PM  
Anonymous Laura said...

I knew that G could read when she was 4, but she wouldn't. She said that only kindergartners could read, and she had to wait. ???? But of course that is an Aspie mind for you - have to follow the rules. She could write her name way early, but her handwriting was horrible until maybe last year (5th grade).

S had the same Charlie issues. She still argues- "WHY do I have to read? I can't read chapter books!" (She's going into 4th grade) The problem with her was finding books that interested her. Once we did that she has been much better.

And when G was about 5, she wrote her name in a library book. We made her use her own money to buy a new one, (it was $3.99) and bring it to the library, to show that one does not deface library books. The librarian said she had never had someone do that in the 10 years she had been there! And then she offered the defaced book to G! When I told her that this would be defeating the purpose, she looked rather surprised.

Geez, its hard being a parent.

7/14/2006 09:36:00 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home